If you can add instruments (midi parts) that fit to a song or change progressively the midi parts to avoid the repetition of the backing organs, do it. 'trouble'.Īlso I don't think I am a fun of the 'KISS' principle in the arrangement part. It would be easier to buy a Korg Pa and play along with the Yamaha Psr to avoid the.

I don't even thave an idea of what program to use for that type of conversion. I am not interested to convert styles and find out how each company can make a midi part to change accordingly to the chord that is pressed,if that's what you mean Am very pleased that yamaha band tracksĪre so easy to modify and I am definitely NOT a style or voice edit maven. I do thank those who have done style conversions from the G70 and the Korg models.Īgain, it is a matter of personal taste in styles and what one wants to achieve. I will concede that the korg and roland styles are more percussive oriented, but the drums channels can also be played with. To address the quote from Drake, he does massive style editing which eliminates that repetitive ingredient.

In many cases and yamaha IMHO excels on those break and variation change buttons. Never had a korg or roland but have lots of the converted styles and still i find the yamaha styles more suitable. Sometimes those phrases 7 & 8 get cancelled or voice substituted. The pad channel track 6? seems to be the culprit for me and that is the one that gets fired. Yes, i do agree that most styles are over accessorized and lately have been deleting some of the channels. Interesting topic and opinion of the yamaha styles so called 'over the top busy ' compared to korg and roland.

Yamaha to korg style converter